Art 1 Sec 1 – Sen Mark Pryor (D-AR) Demonstrates the Obvious
And piling on the Separation of Powers discussion, this piece today from Hot Air, detailing the fact that Senator Mark Pyror (D-AR) will most likely NOT support DiFi’s gun grab “this time” even though he did in 2004.
His reasoning? Simple… he faces re-election soon and supporting a gun grab bill may not sit well with his constituents.
So my question to Senator Pryor is simply this: was the bill Constitutional in your view in 2004? If so, has the bill changed into an unconstitutional variant? If it hasn’t, then you are DUTY bound to support it.
Is this not exactly what the Oath of Office to the Constitution and not to Party or re-election was supposed to do? It reminds us of why it so very important to ask the Constitutional position questions of ALL political office seekers and to get them to carve their positions in stone.
Where is Mark Pyror’s honor?